This module helps you analyze draft prospects for the NHL and explores ways to create sports stories from that analysis.


On this Page


Learning Objectives

By the end of this module, you will be able to:

  • Locate and evaluate reliable data sources for NHL draft-eligible prospects.
  • Apply equivalency and adjustment metrics to compare players across different leagues.
  • Identify strengths, risks, and uncertainty in prospect data.
  • Translate your analysis into a clear, compelling story for fans, media, or teams.

Back to Top


Module Map

This module contains the following progressive lessons.

Back to Top


Module Resources

Below are key resources you can use to follow along with this module.

Back to Top

All module resources can be found at our Data Punk Media GitHub repo folder.

If you're short on time, be sure to check out our quick-hit walkthrough below on YouTube!


Published Story

You can take this story and publish in any number of ways. For example, you could create an article or blog and focus on one or more of the themes we highlighted earlier; you could create a short 5-minute documentary on how Sweden is contributing to the NHL with Ivar Stenberg being the latest prospect; and you could even create a carousel or reel that takes the top 3 outliers and whittles it down to 1. The latter is what we did as an example of how to take this analysis and implement it as a story.

Instagram Carousel: "The Next Top NHL Prospect May Surprise You..."

We'll likely do more stories on prospects in the future. With the NHL's global reach, we're now seeing amazing prospects coming in from all around the world.

Back to Top

Check out our Stories page for more deep dives on different data stories.

Key Takeaways

The below summarizes learnings and takeaways that you can apply to your own storytelling projects.

1. Be careful with equivalency scores

This is especially so when you're translating across so many leagues to express and represent potential at the NHL level. The NHLe is not perfect; it's directional. And you can find discrepancies in the way each league is scored. So, if you choose to rely on this within your model, be sure to note this as an assumption.

📈
This is an important one because a single translation score that really mess with the insights coming from your analysis. So, be sure to research and test the results when using equivalency scores.

2. There isn't a lot of data when it comes to prospects

This is unfortunate because it's an important part of gauging evolution from the minors into the pros. You saw that we a 'small data' problem with, for example, a low number of Games Played for some of the players. Arguably, you'd want to see 20+ games to get a sense for trend and player performance.

3. Attack the data from different angles

You saw in this module how if we were to approach the data singly from the Adjusted Points per Game angle, this may ignore other important elements (e.g., statistical bias from a lower number of games played, high PIMs indicating potential disciplinary issues, etc.). And when you do use different methods, there are points of conflation that are more qualitative. This is where you expertise and understanding of the game come into play.

Back to Top


Additional Resources

Here are some additional resources you may find useful.

Back to Top


Up Next

In our next module, we'll focus on What Makes a Superbowl Championship Team?